The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

The U.S. Needs a Chemical Warfare Capability


Article # : 13960 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 2 / 1988  2,879 Words
Author : Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.
Joseph D. Douglass is a national security consultant. His latest book, America the Vulnerable (Lexington Books, 1987), presents a detailed account of the threat of chemical and biological welfare.

       During the 1950s, the world witnessed the emergence of a revolution in military affairs brought about by nuclear weapons. These weapons provided enormous increases in explosive power. The weapons were so much more powerful than their conventional predecessors that new terms for explosive power were needed--kilotons and megatons of TNT equivalent. Yet as great as these increases in explosive power were, they were not nearly as significant as the improvements in chemical and biological weapons that have been made possible by the revolution in life sciences that emerged in the mid-1970s and is still just in its infancy.
       
        Nevertheless, between 1969 and 1974, the United States effectively discarded its chemical warfare capability. This was not the result of an arms control agreement. It was simply a unilateral action that reflected the defense establishment's dislike for the field, the adverse publicity that had arisen out of the use of Agent Orange in Vietnam, continuing efforts by the Soviets to pressure the United States into unilaterally leaving the field, and the efforts of certain Western scientists to end the use of biological and chemical agents in war.
       
        In 1974, the U.S. Army even decided to disband its Chemical Corps. However, the Chemical Corps had been established by Congress, and the Army learned that it would have to return to Congress to abolish the Corps. The timing for such an action was unpropitious, since a flood of information was emerging indicating that the Soviets were hard at work expanding their chemical warfare capability and that U.S. and NATO forces had become exceedingly vulnerable to chemical attacks. Studies concluded that for all target complexes examined, a Soviet attack with chemical munitions ... (1995 of 17849 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy