The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Journalists, Entertainers, or Educators?


Article # : 13963 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 2 / 1988  2,923 Words
Author : John Silber
John Silber is president of Boston University.

       Trained to expect instant gratification from food, sex, and images of violence, Americans are further trained to expect instant gratification from the news. If the news cannot quite be popped like pills or munched like potato chips, we must at least try to achieve instant insight--bite-sized understanding. So broadcasters believe, it seems, at least to judge form American television practices. The industry operates on the educational theory that the viewer's attention span is 90 seconds. The fact that any good teacher can hold the attention of students for 50 minutes is conveniently ignored. And television, by imposing the 90-second standard, has thereby contributed to the illiteracy of those it should ideally be educating. Consider the effects of this on Americans' understanding of world issues and matters of grave national import. Instead of presenting the news coherently, it has reduced the news to a form of episodic entertainment--the "miniseries of reality."
       
        The consequence of news treated as entertainment is a form of censorship. The president of the United States gives, let us suppose, a major speech. What happens? A commentator precedes the speech in order to "prep" the public by telling it in predigested form what the president is about to say. After the speech, a panel of commentators tells the public what the president has just said. In doing so, no commentator merely reports the president's words--that would be repetitive and would therefore lack entertainment value. Instead, he adds his own interpretation and emphasis. Next, politicians from the opposing party comment on the speech--but this is still not enough. Even more remote commentators are called upon to interpret the speech: Experts from other nations are summoned to tell us not only what our president said, but what it means. Finally, to cap ... (2000 of 17264 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy