The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

The Middle East and Soviet Strategy


Article # : 14139 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 1 / 1988  2,964 Words
Author : Avigdor Haselkorn
Avigdor Haselkorn is a senior analyst for Analytical Assessments Corporation.

       In recent years there has been a lot written about "trees" in the Middle East. In contrast, only scant attention has been paid to the "forest" there. Yet, it is precisely the macro-level analysis that suggests that a fundamental shift in the constellation of forces in the region has been under way for some time. The transformation has been mainly the result of local changes to which both superpowers have sought to respond. However, at the moment it appears as if the Soviet Union has a better appreciation of the new circumstances in the area, and recent shifts in its Middle East policy imply that the Kremlin is seeking to adjust to the regional dynamics in order to benefit from it.
       
        Students of international relations have long been preoccupied with assessing the relative power of various countries. A list of indicators of potential power, it is commonly agreed, includes such elements as a country's area, natural resources, population, military posture, and so on. However, in the Middle East--an area of active conflicts--an important discrepancy between actual and potential power has become apparent. Moreover, the relevance of a country's actual power in such a region has increasingly superseded the calculus of potential capabilities. Consequently, ranking local countries in the Middle East according to their strategic significance appears to have less to do with the traditional indices of power.
       
        For example, while Iran under the shah ranked high in terms of both its quantitative and qualitative military capabilities, it was not until the rise of the Khomeini regime that this country emerged as a discrete regional power pole. This happened in spite of the fact that Iran's military arsenal is presently a shadow of its previous size or ... (2000 of 18393 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy