|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Was France the Fatherland of Genocide?
| Article
# : |
14164 |
|
|
Section : |
MODERN THOUGHT
|
| Issue
Date : |
1 / 1988 |
2,252 Words |
| Author
: |
Laurent Ladouce
Laurent Ladouce is a lecturer at the Sorbonne who has written
widely on liberation theology. |
When Michel Baroin, the president of several insurance companies and a Freemason, was asked a few months ago to preside over the organization of the bicentenary of the French Revolution, many Frenchmen rejoiced: It was wise, so it was thought, to choose a man known for his moderation, his ecumenical ideas, his lifetime dedication to promoting dialogue and mutual understanding among ideological and political opponents. Baroin himself declared that he would make the bicentenary an occasion for national reconciliation.
After all, the spirit of the times seemed to favor this noble idea of a national reconciliation. In 1987, two years before the anniversary of its famous Revolution, France is celebrating the millennium of the crowning of Hugh Capet, the first "French" king and founder of a dynasty of French monarchs that was interrupted in January 1793 with the decapitation of King Louis XVI during the Revolution. Furthermore, the unusual "cohabitation" between a socialist president and a conservative prime minister seems to encourage dialogue and reconciliation. In 1988, the French will have to elect a new president, and this event will take place right between the millennium and the bicentenary celebrations.
For all these reasons, one may easily guess Baroin's satisfaction when he was appointed for this particular task. Sadly, however, destiny was not on his side: Baroin tragically disappeared in a plane accident a few weeks after he was chosen.
Had he survived, it remains doubtful that he would have achieved national reconciliation around the symbolism of the Revolution. Both intellectual and moral forces make such a reconciliation
... (1992 of 13997 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
