|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
The Twilight of Refuge in the West
| Article
# : |
14224 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
7 / 1988 |
5,259 Words |
| Author
: |
Bill Frelick
Bill Frelick is on the staff of the U.S. Committee for
Refugees. |
"Knock, Knock."
"Who's there?"
If the answer is: "An asylum seeker," more often than not there will be no punch-line. The door will simply close again. Western nations, perceiving the influx of asylum seekers as a "flood," do not want to face them as individuals in need of help. The easiest way to avoid facing them is to deny them entry in the first place.
The international standards governing refugee protection obligate nations not to return persons to countries where their lives or freedom would be threatened. However, those same standards do not obligate governments to admit the refugee or asylum seeker who harbors such fears.
Therefore, the notion seems to be gaining ground that not admitting refugees is the most convenient and economical way of handling the problem. Governments do not have to consider granting asylum to people who are never admitted. Increasingly, this has resulted in erection of legal, even physical, barriers to block access of would-be asylum seekers.
While the factors causing forced migration--wars, famine, civil strife, and persecution--have not eased in the 1980s, new communication and transportation technologies have reached the Third World in a way that has had a startling impact on refugee movements. For the first time, significant numbers have begun to travel spontaneously, to seek safety far from the scene of conflict and
... (1907 of 31497 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
