|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Can SDI Be Saved?
| Article
# : |
14401 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
6 / 1988 |
1,919 Words |
| Author
: |
Daniel O. Graham
Lt. Gen. Daniel O. Graham is director of High Frontier, a
research and educational organization devoted to strategic
defense and space policy issues. |
It is clear that the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) will be the prime international and security issue in the upcoming 1988 elections. A recent survey of the positions of Democratic and Republican contenders for president showed an overlap of opinion on all national security issues except one--SDI--which all Democrats firmly opposed and all Republicans supported. This explains why there has been little debate of the SDI issue during the primary election season: All candidates within each party agree with their rivals. But in the general election, SDI will almost certainly become a hot issue.
All of the Democratic candidates for president condemn SDI, along with defense expenditures in general. The most prodefense candidate, Albert Gore, ranks as a superdove among those who follow voting patterns on defense issues. His voting record and that of antidefense Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut are identical on defense issues, and Gore admits to having seriously considered defecting to Canada to avoid service in the armed forces.
Over the past few months, tens of thousands of letters have gone out from the Democratic National Committee (DNC), signed by Chairman Paul G. Kirk. It starts, "The news I am about to tell you is almost too good to be true. We can put an end to the Star Wars defensive system."
This letter to the faithful underscores the antidefense affliction of the Democratic Party, one that has been decried openly by some of its moderate-to-conservative leaders, to little or no avail.
Nevertheless, Democratic voters support the
... (1999 of 11538 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
