The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

D.H. Lawrence and the Tyranny of Desire


Article # : 14431 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 6 / 1988  6,196 Words
Author : Eugene Goodheart
Eugene Goodheart is chairman of the English department at Brandeis University and has written extensively on D.H. Lawrence.

       Our most powerful associations with the work of D.H. Lawrence revolve around his imagination of scenes of sexual passion. In the popular imagination, Lawrence is often seen as the greatest of our modern professors of desire. I will argue that this liberationist vision represents a profound misunderstanding of Lawrence's achievement, provoked in part by Lawrence himself. When, for instance, Lawrence asserts the claim of the passional consciousness (or unconsciousness) against what he views as the repressive character of Freudian psychology, we must be careful how we construe the basic terms of Lawrence's critique. Character, personality, consciousness, unconsciousness, among other words, are invested with meanings different from, and in some cases opposed to, conventional understanding of them. A reconsideration of Lawrence's attitude toward desire could fruitfully begin with his critique of Freud.
       
        Lawrence's most sustained critique of Freudian psychology can be found in two long essays: "Psychoanalysis and the Unconscious" and "Fantasies of the Unconscious." In the first, Lawrence sets out to distinguish the Freudian unconscious from his own conception by identifying the former with inauthentic neurotic life and his own with authentic creative life. in dialectical fashion, Lawrence does not dismiss the Freudian concept from the scene; rather, he places it as an expression (or in therapeutic terms, a system) of the condition that psychoanalysis aims to cure.
       
        As Lawrence understands the Freudian unconscious, there are two versions of it that are not consistent with each other. In the first version, the unconscious is a seething, inchoate energy of sex and excrement, "nothing but a slimy serpent of sex, and heaps of excrement, and ... (1996 of 37193 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy