The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Prejudiced Press and the Election


Article # : 14883 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 10 / 1988  2,405 Words
Author : Brent H. Baker and Marc S. Ryan
Brent H. Baker is executive director of the Media Research Center (MRC) and editor of its monthly newsletter, Media Watch. Marc S. Ryan is the MRC's vice president for research and Media Watch's associate editor. MRC media analyst Dorothy Warner provided research for this article.


       Enthusiastic Republicans from across America Arrived in New Orleans to nominate George Bush as their candidate for president of the United States. But ABC, CBS, CNN, and NBC were also enthusiastic--in picking up the cause of the Democrats and going on the attack against the values and policies supported by the GOP.
       
        Media Research Center analysis of how the four major television networks covered the August convention found that reporters repeatedly portrayed the Republicans as extreme and on the fringe of the American political spectrum: in other words, simply out of tune with average Americans. How did they do this? By incessantly labeling convention-goers as conservative ideologues and attacking Republicans all they could--on issues including opposition to abortion, ERA, the plant closings bill, and the Civil Rights Restoration Act.
       
        That's quite a different approach than the networks had taken in Atlanta a month earlier, when they fawned over the Democrats and their views. Democratic National Chairman Paul Kirk could not have been happier. Thanks to the networks, his charade worked. Viewers at home saw presidential nominee Michael Dukakis portrayed as a competent manager and political moderate, not an ideological liberal. In fact, network anchors and reporters labeled Dukakis a moderate about as often as they tagged him liberal. The networks avoided substance as much as possible. Any controversies surrounding the Democrats and criticisms all but ignored. Instead, Dukakis ended up just where he wanted to be: holding down the middle ground between Jesse Jackson on the left and vice presidential nominee Lloyd Bentsen on the right.
       
        ... (2000 of 14378 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy