|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Return to the House of Usher: Philip Glass and Richard Foreman Do Up Poe
| Article
# : |
14959 |
|
|
Section : |
THE ARTS
|
| Issue
Date : |
9 / 1988 |
1,858 Words |
| Author
: |
Anthony Kenny
Anthony Kenny is a writer on the arts and lives in New York
City. |
Edgar Allan Poe's nightmare of dread, The Fall of the House of Usher, has continually inspired visual artists and musicians alike. No less than five film versions exist, the earliest being the 1928 La Chute de la Maison Usher, on which the great Spanish surrealist, Luis Bunuel, cut his teeth as an assistant director. The late French cinema historian Henri Langlois called it "the cinematic equivalent of Debussy."
Not coincidentally, it was Debussy who began an opera on the Poe work, the second such work he considered worthy of operatic adaptation (the other being Maurice Maeterlinck's equally melancholy Pelleas et Melisande). The unfinished work, a little over thirty minutes of music, is an eerie extravaganza of sound--music with plenty of weeping and gnashing of teeth in it. The fragmentary Debussy work is arguably the scariest music ever written, with Rachmaninoff's Isle of the Dead giving it stiff competition.
It is easy to see why musicians can be attracted to The Fall of the House of Usher, a compressed work of great intensity in which sound plays a predominant part: wailing, screaming, flapping window shuters, the howling wind, and so on.
So it is no surprise that the current king of crossover classical music, Philip Glass, was moved to attempt what Debussy regrettably never finished. As his visual collaborator Glass chose iconoclastic New York theater director/playwright/designer Richard foreman (Rhoda in Potatoland, Film Is Evil: Radio is Good). The two are well-met by dark corridors and dungeons.
The world premiere of the
... (1987 of 11096 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
