The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Life Under Perestroika


Article # : 16299 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 3 / 1989  3,059 Words
Author : Nicolai N. Petro
Nicolai N. Petro is lecturer in political science at the University of Pennsylvania. He recently served as policy adviser in the Office of Soviet Union Affairs at the Department of State, and as political attaché at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow.

       To assess the effect of perestroika on people's lives in the Soviet Union, one could ask the same question Ronald Reagan asked the American people in 1980, "Are you better off today than you were four years ago?" There is, unfortunately, no means of conducting such a survey, but by nearly every Soviet and Western account the answer would be a resounding no.
       
        More importantly, there is increasing evidence that the average Soviet citizen does not feel that he is ever likely to be better off if the country sticks to the limited reform agenda proposed by Mikhail Gorbachev. What seems to be developing out of this discontent is a type of perestroika that is not entirely controlled by the Kremlin and that could have some surprising results.
       
        When Gorbachev came to power in March 1985, he inherited what he termed a "pre-crisis" situation in the Soviet Union. The previous 15 years had seen a noticeable decline in the rate of growth of the national income. The average annual increase in economic production, as Soviet economists were urgently pointing out, was so low that it did not provide for any growth in living standards or for the capital investment urgently needed to replace aging equipment. Four successive harvest failures between 1979 and 1982 led to the introduction of rationing cards in 20 major cities for the first time since the end of World War II.
       
        The social effects of a failing economic system could no longer be ignored. The most obvious was the pervasiveness of alcohol abuse. In 1978 alone, for example, over 100 times more deaths were attributed to alcohol poisoning in the USSR than in the United States during the same period. Even ... (1997 of 19357 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy