The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Will There Be an Afghanistan Syndrome?


Article # : 16434 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 5 / 1989  3,013 Words
Author : Stephen A. Garrett
Stephen A. Garrett is professor of international policy studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies in Monterey, California.

       The American philosopher George Santayana, in an endlessly repeated comment concerning the lessons of history, argued that "those who cannot remember the past are condemned to relive it." Following the final withdrawal of Soviet forces from Afghanistan, the question arises as to whether the Soviets could have avoided their disastrous encounter with that country had they remembered the American experience in Vietnam.
       
        Comparing the Afghanistan and Vietnam episodes has actually been something of a cottage industry among political commentators ever since the initial Soviet intervention in December 1979. Inevitably, these analyses have been of varying usefulness and cogency; but there are certain rather striking parallels between the two events that continue to deserve attention, perhaps especially so now that Soviet forces have completed their exit under the terms of the Geneva agreement.
       
        It must be said at the outset that there is one fundamental difference between Afghanistan and Vietnam that must be recognized: whatever one feels about the wisdom of the American role in Vietnam, and the suffering that this policy occasioned for both Americans and Vietnamese alike, there is no question but that the United States was attempting to sustain an indigenous regime in Saigon against external aggression. To be sure, the Vietnam conflict had elements of a civil war. There was ample reason for many Vietnamese in the south to be unhappy with the character of the government in Saigon, and a number of these joined in the military effort to overthrow that government. Particularly as the war progressed, however, the bulk of the military pressure against the Saigon government was a result of a fairly traditional invasion by North Vietnamese ... (1995 of 18871 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy