The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Why Not Enough Is Being Done About Ecological Dangers


Article # : 15204 

Section : NATURAL SCIENCE
Issue Date : 4 / 1989  3,980 Words
Author : Stanislaw Andreski
Stanislaw Andreski is professor emeritus of sociology at the University of Reading, United Kingdom. His books include Social Sciences as Sorcery, the African Predicament: A Study in Pathology of Modernization, and Parasitism and Subversion: the Case of Latin America. His latest book is Syphilis, Puritanism and Witch-hunts, which will published in 1989 by Macmillan Press, Ltd., London.

       There is a striking contrast between the foresight and caution that most people show in arranging their personal affairs, and the utter improvidence displayed by mankind as a whole. When choosing a job many people take into consideration the pension rights, even though they are still very far from using them. They endure tedious training and save for the sake of a future benefit. They take out insurance against unlikely dangers. Many even try to reduce the tax on inheritance payable to their heirs. Yet collectively--in the face of dangers from which nobody can escape except by dying soon--mankind is behaving like a man who is trying to get firewood by sawing off the branch on which he is sitting. What are the reasons for the discrepancy?
       
        The first and most obvious, though not necessarily the most important, is the novelty of the situation. Nobody foresaw the possibility of destruction of the environment. Even Thomas Malthus, who pointed out the limit to the growth of the population, thought only of the scarcity of resources: He did not envisage the possibility that natural resources might be diminished by the pressure of the population upon them as has happened in many cases of soil erosion. All the most renowned thinkers of the past--from Auguste Comte, Karl Marx, and Herbert Spencer to Max Weber, Bertrand Russell, and John Maynard Keynes--were totally oblivious to the danger of pollution. Nonetheless, knowledge about the coming ecological predicament has been available for more than 30 years, but very little has been done about it. So, there is more to it than sheer novelty.
       
        The desire to avert the eyes from this knowledge stems from its depressing nature. Having suffered for so long from poverty and sickness, mankind was ... (1993 of 23825 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy