The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Could Labor Win in Britain?


Article # : 15426 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 12 / 1989  2,146 Words
Author : Stephen Haseler
Stephen Haseler is professor of government at City of London College and a fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C.

       When Britain's opposition Labor Party descended upon the southern coastal town of Brighton in October, the question on most lips was quite simple: Could Labor, out in the political cold for the past 10 years, produce the policies to achieve victory in the next national election, now only a couple of years away?
       
        By the time the delegates had left Brighton, a general feeling prevailed that the party had at least made some headway in making itself palatable to voters. Yet, it is a testimony to the lasting effect of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher upon British politics that, in order to put itself even within distance of wining the next election, the Labor party was forced to adopt not only "Thatcherite" rhetoric but also "Thatcherite" policy.
       
        As part of this accommodation to "Thatcherism," Labor's leadership (now fully in control of the party machinery) decided to use the opportunity of the conference to display how far it was prepared to go in dumping its left-wing image. Labor's new slogan, "Meet the Challenge: Make the Change," set the tone for a volte-face in ideology. "Socialism," once the staple of many a speech from the podium, was hardly mentioned at all--except, that is, for the new and strange concept of "supply-side socialism." On the other hand, the rhetoric was thick with talk about "markets," "efficiency," and "opportunity."
       
        In his leader's speech to the delegates, Neil Kinnock, once the doyen of romantic leftism, decided to abandon every left-wing nostrum he had peddled during the early 1980s and, instead, concentrate on bland assertions of his "green" credentials. Kinnock, like American presidential candidate Michael ... (1993 of 13100 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy