|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
The Political and Cultural Function of the Movie
| Article
# : |
15427 |
|
|
Section : |
EDITORIAL
|
| Issue
Date : |
12 / 1989 |
1,351 Words |
| Author
: |
Morton A. Kaplan
Editor and Publisher |
The Special Section this month examines the impact of films on culture. As the articles in the special section make clear, film is playing an increasingly important role in the life and conversations of educated Americans. An increasing number of directors are credited with important cultural contributions, and film critics have become important personalities. Although I recognize the pragmatic importance of the film phenomenon, I will take a dissenting view in this editorial.
I must confess to having lost my fondness for cinema after seeing Last Year at Marienbad in 1961. Movies I find are most boring when they pretend to great sophistication and turn out to be most entertaining when least pretentions. Although film can be an art form, personally I find that only a small number of directors--Renoir, Ray, Flaherty, and perhaps two or three others--have possessed the required talent. And I am sick to death of hearing the political opinions of stars whose incoherent views are broadcast only because of their celebrity status.
Nonetheless, I retain fond memories of my former movie-going days. Robert Flaherty's Louisiana Story transformed the way in which I saw space and light. In The Bridge over the River Kwai the tension in the Japanese colonel's neck when he severed his topknot encapsulated the remarkable way in which that film captured the incommensurability of Japanese and Western cultures. The magnificence of this achievement left me searching for a properly descriptive and appreciative term. Charlie Chaplin and Buster Kenton provided many pleasant moments, even though Chaplin's acclaimed Modern Times said more about the way he a would have functioned on the assembly line than about the individual worker of the 1930s,
... (1997 of 7960 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
