The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

A Progressive View of Tort Law


Article # : 15665 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 2 / 1989  5,990 Words
Author : James Boyle
James Boyle is a professor at Washington College of Law, American University.

       At first blush, tort law seems like a strange thing to treat from a political, let alone a progressive, perspective. For a start, some people do not even know what tort law is, and those who do could be forgiven for associating it with dense law books rather than with ideological strife. Despite all of this, tort law turns out to be a surprisingly important political issue. Its ambit includes everything from liability for pollution to safety in the workplace, from the socialization of risk to product liability. It is the body or rules, principles, policies, and arguments that lawyers turn to when confronted by tragedies like Bhopal or Love Canal. But it is also a set of moral, economic, and political ideas about society, about bonds between people, about who should pay when bad things happen. The point that I am trying to make is that tort law is a political issue not only because it concerns the safety of the public and the allocation of profits and losses, but also because it deals with our contradictory and unconscious ideas about what is right and wrong, about what a good society would look like.
       
        Most legal articles about tort law concentrate on the rules and the question of whose ox is to be gored. Most newspaper reports, on the other hand, concentrate on the "outrageous" cases--man who throws himself in front of a subway train and then sues the subway because he gets hurt. Neither the scholar nor the journalist seem to understand that these are simply two sides of the same coin. You cannot understand the success of the insurance industry's attempts to roll tort law back into the 1890s without understanding the popular image of tort law--culled not from the Harvard Law Review but from the pages of the National Enquirer. By the same token, you cannot understand the attraction of the National Enquirer's view of ... (1998 of 34580 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy