The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

What to Do About Congress


Article # : 15840 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 1 / 1989  3,209 Words
Author : Roger H. Davidson
Roger H. Davidson is professor of government and politics at the University of Maryland, College Park. He is also a consultant to the Congressional Research Service, U.S. Library of Congress, where he served from 1980 to 1988 as senior specialist in American national government and public administration. Davidson is author or coauthor of more than 100 articles and books dealing with Congress and national policy-making.

       Belittling Congress is a venerable American pastime. Lord Bryce observed in the nineteenth century that "Americans are especially fond of running down their Congressmen." Will Rogers quipped that he consulted the Congressional Record whenever he needed new material. Nor was Rogers the only humorist to seek laughs at the expense of the national legislature: From Mark Twain and H.T. Mencken to Mark Russell and Johnny Carson, pundits and comedians have found Congress an inexhaustible source of raw material.
       
        Serious commentators' views of Congress are apt to be just as disdainful. Journalists and scholars tend to see Congress as an irresponsible and somewhat sleazy body of people, not far removed from Woodrow Wilson's description of the House of Representatives as "a disintegrated mass of jarring elements."
       
        Wilson can probably be blamed for starting the tradition of academic disparagement of American legislative bodies. One of the earliest political science professors--long before he went to the White House--Wilson openly admired the British parliamentary system for what he saw as its coherence and party discipline--qualities he found in short supply in Washington during the 1870s.
       
        By the time I made my way through college political science courses a generation ago, the negative view of the "textbook congress" was well entrenched. The typical text boasted two chapters on the presidency, filled with awed descriptions of the president as "the great engine of democracy" or "a kind of magnificent lion who can roam widely and do great deeds." The single chapter devoted to Congress zeroed in on "congressional reform," reciting the litany of ... (2000 of 19943 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy