The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

How to End the Budget Deficit


Article # : 15844 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 1 / 1989  3,780 Words
Author : Thomas E. Mann and Charles L. Schultze
Thomas E. Mann is director of the Brookings Governmental Studies program. Charles L. Schultze is director of the Brookings Economic Studies program.

       The new president faces a formidable political challenge. While some economists and financial leaders have for years been warning that large budget deficits would lead to catastrophe, none has occurred, and the public is growing immune to scare talk. Although far from guaranteed, the United States may be able to continue with large budget deficits and national overspending for another presidential term. The costs of failing to deal with the budget deficit are no less real for all of that.
       
        But, they are gradual in nature, involving an almost imperceptible slowing year by year in the growth of American living standards. Like the fat person who needs to go on a diet but who feels that one more high-calorie meal won't hurt, Americans may rightly feel that one more year of high deficits will not itself cause grave damages. But continue the overeating, and the overspending, and long-term damage mounts up.
       
        Unfortunately, the American political system is not well suited to address this challenge. While no democratic government can easily impose immediate sacrifices on its populace for the sake of future gains, the division of authority and responsibility between the president and Congress makes that task especially formidable in this case. In times of crisis, the government can move with breathtaking speed to change national policy; it can be equally responsive in the face of an insistent, unified citizenry demanding action from its elected officials. But political and institutional forces make it almost impossible for government to embrace austerity measures over the opposition of the public and with no promise of immediate gain or avoidance of ... (1912 of 23001 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy