|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
The President Needs the PFIAB
| Article
# : |
15981 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
7 / 1989 |
1,994 Words |
| Author
: |
Lawrence B. Sulc
Lawrence B. Sulc is president of the Nathan Hale Institute. |
Is the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB), which has given valuable advice to U.S. presidents since the Eisenhower administration, on the way out? New York Times columnist William Safire and other PFIAB watchers--people in the "unofficial" intelligence community, as it is called--think so.
To determine whether this is a good idea, it is important to look at the board's history and accomplishments.
In 1953, Congress, favorably impressed by the work of the First Hoover Commission, established six years before, set up another. Both commissions--named after their chairman, former President Herbert Hoover--were created to study the organization and administration of certain aspects of the government. Among other things, the Second Hoover Commission examined the condition of U.S. intelligence.
In 1955, the commission's task force on intelligence reported that the quality of U.S. intelligence was unacceptable. World developments, including the advent of nuclear weapons, had made "adequate and timely intelligence imperative to our national security," the task force said. "The preservation of the United States requires an effective intelligence capability." Moreover, the panel declared, it was essential that U.S. intelligence "be given the support necessary to protect our national security." The second Hoover Commission recommended, therefore, that the president appoint "a committee of experienced private citizens, who shall have the responsibility to examine and report to him periodically on the work of Government foreign intelligence
... (1908 of 13310 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
