The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Warning: Proceed With Caution


Article # : 16807 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 9 / 1989  2,605 Words
Author : Steven L. Spiegel
Steven L. Spiegel is professor of political science at the University of California at Los Angeles specializing in American policy in the Middle East.

       Many in the West today are convinced that sweeping changes are necessary in Palestine, as they were once convinced about Iran under the shah. The intifada and Palestine Liberation Organization Chairman Yasser Arafat's apparent new moderation have spawned a cottage industry devoted to the proposition that PLO-Israeli dialogue and the existence of a Palestinian state will rid us of our Mideast dilemmas once and for all, will bring peace and justice in their wake, and will liberate Jews worldwide from the image of inflicting oppressive acts on Palestinians.
       
        Those who regularly glorify Arafat these days accept without question the idea that the peace process will lead to a Palestinian ministate on the West Bank and Gaza Strip. They dismiss or ignore traditional objections. Even though many of these objections have become so old they are now boring and uninteresting, they need to be reviewed because the stakes are too high for decisions to be made on the basis of faith and hope.
       
        We should remember that a Palestinian state would be a geopolitical nightmare. Two sovereign politics in a tiny territory the size of New Jersey would be locked in a deadly embrace. The ever-present threat of a terrorist incident, a volatile speech by one leader or another, or the machinations of an outside power could result at any time in the possibility of war. Of course, in its first few years such a state would be carefully demilitarized and patrolled by some kind of international force; but how would Palestinian government stop terrorism without an indigenous and armed police force? What if evidence of peace treaty violations occurs? Who decides if they merit Israeli reentry? If, as is likely, a Palestinian state and Israel regard each other with ... (1996 of 15592 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy