|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Our Defense Needs in the 1990s
| Article
# : |
16936 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
4 / 1990 |
3,541 Words |
| Author
: |
Ken Adelman
Ken Adelmen is the former director of the Arms Control and
Disarmament Agency. |
The twentieth century enters its final decade much as it entered its first decade. The fashionable view then held that "modern conditions" of communications, dialogue, and respect for law had made large-scale war forevermore obsolete. This view was nicely summarized by a young Winston Churchill:
“War is too foolish, too fantastic to be thought of in the Twentieth Century….Civilization has climbed above such perils. The interdependence of nations in trade and traffic, the sense of public law, the Hague Convention, liberal principles…have rendered such nightmares impossible.”
After presenting this position, Churchill asked pointedly: "Are you quite sure? It would be a pity to be wrong."
It was a pity, as the wholesale carnage of World Wars I and II lay ahead. With the same view now prevailing - we presume with more merit than back then - it would still be a pity to be wrong.
For eternal peace to break out is a consummation devoutly to be wished for. But to believe it has already happened constitutes an act of faith, something akin to what Dr. Samuel Johnson called second marriages - a triumph of hope over experience.
Human nature does not change that rapidly. The new world we face is fraught with unpredictability, wherein defense needs have not vanished. No one should embark upon a race to determine who can disarm America the quickest to become the weakest soonest. "The moment we knew the armistice was to have been signed, we took the harness
... (1996 of 21032 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
