|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Searching for the Elusive Peace Dividend
| Article
# : |
16938 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
4 / 1990 |
2,342 Words |
| Author
: |
Donald Lambro
Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent for the
Washington Times. |
As the once-mighty specter of Soviet and Eastern European communism is being swept away by wave after wave of demands for democracy and freedom, the focus of America's budget debate has shifted to cutting its huge and costly military arsenal.
President Bush has further fueled that debate by offering a defense budget for fiscal 1991 whose rate of growth does not even keep up with inflation, as well as by unexpectedly proposing to cut U.S. troop strength in Western Europe far deeper than he had proposed last May.
Indeed, the historic and rapidly unfolding reforms in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe have sent defense planners back to the drawing boards to recraft the nation's long-range national security needs accordingly. Defense Secretary Richard Cheney has even suggested that his budget could be cut by tens of billions of dollars in the first half of this decade alone and has ordered contingency budgets prepared that would do just that.
As a further result of significantly improved relations with the Soviet Union and the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe, three former chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff - retired Gens. David C. Jones and John W. Vessey, Jr., and retired Adm. William J. Crowe, Jr. - have unanimously recommended to Congress that the MX and Midgetman missile systems be scuttled. Little wonder, then, that Democratic congressional leaders such as House Speaker Thomas Foley are openly saying that the Pentagon will be the No.1 budget-cutting target in Congress' efforts to reach the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings deficit reduction goal of $64 billion in the coming fiscal
... (1945 of 13929 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
