The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

'Never Enough of Nothing to Do': On the Autobiography of G.K. Chesterton


Article # : 17072 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 8 / 1990  6,156 Words
Author : James V. Schall, S.J.
James V. Schall, S.J., is associate professor of government at Georgetown University. His most recent work is entitled the Politics of Heaven and Hell.

       Cicero, the great Roman philosopher and orator, who, through his articulateness and good sense, is responsible for much of the form and content of civilization itself, began to letter to his son, Marcus, then studying in Athens, with his famous passage: "Publius Cornelius Scipio, the first of that family to called Africanus, used to remark that he was never less idle than when he had nothing to do, and never less lonely than when he was by himself." Indeed, it might be argued that the very possibility of civilization begins in this solitude, in what we do when, to put it paradoxically as Chesterton himself would, we have precisely nothing to do. The great question of civilization remains "What do you do when all else is done?" or to put it in another way, "What are the higher things for which we are each of us in our very being constituted?'
       
        Chesterton begins the tenth chapter of his Autobiography, which he titled "Friendship and Foolery," by noting that some people complain about a man "for doing nothing." He continues, "There are some, still more mysterious and amazing, who complain of having nothing to do." Those who do nothing and those who have nothing to do are perhaps not at all the same people. Anyone familiar with the classical tradition from which Chesterton came will immediately recognize that when we do precisely "nothing," we are concerned about those things beyond use and pleasure that are "for their own sakes," as the Greeks put it. At the same time, those who have "nothing to do" may well be busying themselves doing those presumably necessary things that in fact ought to be done but that do not reach to the heart of what we really want to do and be. Hence, such people are dissatisfied because they have nothing serious to do in their ... (1921 of 34749 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy