|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Searching for Stability
| Article
# : |
17164 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
12 / 1990 |
3,242 Words |
| Author
: |
Robert G. Neumann
Robert G. Neumann is senior adviser of Middle East Studies at
the Center for Strategic and International Studies in
Washington, D.C. |
The present crisis over Iraq's seizure of Kuwait is both a world problem and a Middle Eastern issue. For well over 50 years, the world enjoyed a precarious near-stability in the shadow of U.S.-Soviet rivalry. Adventure-seeking rulers were frequently clients of one of the two super-powers and had to be concerned about the reaction of the other.
Now this restraint has greatly diminished, and Saddam Hussein's caper has caused the first post-Cold War conflict. As the world is becoming ever more fractured by the appearance of new nations and the revival of ethnic, religious, tribal, and other animosities, this episode may have considerable influence on the new international order and future conflicts.
This event constitutes such an obvious threat to American, European, Soviet, and Japanese interests, as well as those of other Arab countries, that a large alliance has formed quickly. We may not always be so fortunate. Had Saddam Hussein gotten away with his invasion and annexation of Kuwait, he would have acquired an overpowering influence on Saudi Arabia and all other Arab Gulf states. It is immaterial whether he actually wanted to invade Saudi Arabia or not; that kingdom would have been coerced and its ruling family eventually replaced by Hussein's henchmen. Allowing the Iraqi dictator to acquire a stranglehold on the major sources of the world's oil supply was impermissible to the United States and its allies.
Simply evacuating Kuwait would not be enough if Saddam Hussein were to remain in power, able to wait until America and its allies might be distracted. There is no doubt that his perceived victory, if Iraq were permitted to keep even part
... (2000 of 19943 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
