|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Introduction: A U.S. Strategy for the Unpredictable '90s
| Article
# : |
17397 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
1 / 1990 |
600 Words |
| Author
: |
Editor
|
We may or may not be at the "end" of history, with liberal democracy triumphant, but there is little doubt that we are watching the beginning of the end of communism in Eastern Europe. In country after country, the people are seeking to remove the barriers of Marxism-Leninism just as surely as the people of East and West Berlin are tearing down the Wall. Where it will all end, knows only God. After all, who imagined that Ronald Reagan's "evil empire" would hold multi-candidate elections in 1988? Who foretold that Reagan's successor would be calling on the West to help a Soviet leader stay in office?
Amid so many fast-paced changes, what the United States needs is not ad hoc policies but a comprehensive strategy. In this month's Special Report, THE WORLD & I presents a region-by-region plan to deal with the unpredictable decade ahead.
One thing has not changed: The center of U.S. strategy is its relations with the Soviet Union. There is a consensus that Gorbachev is a lesser evil that any of the hard-liners who might replace him; it is therefore in the U.S. national interest that he stay in power to carry out his reforms. Harvard scholar Marshall Goldman is convinced this is the right policy. "Americans should ask themselves," argues Goldman, "if they would be willing to offer massive support of the Soviet Union if it were beset by another enormous earthquake." According to Goldman, Gorbachev faces a nationwide political earthquake, and there are many ways that Americans can and should help (such as providing commodities and practical management advice) to transform the Soviets' military-style society into a consumer-oriented market economy.
... (1908 of 3609 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
