|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Perpetuating the Status Quo
| Article
# : |
17485 |
|
|
Section : |
THE ARTS
|
| Issue
Date : |
7 / 1990 |
1,876 Words |
| Author
: |
Eric Gibson
Eric Gibson, art critic for the Washington Times, last wrote
on Henry Ossewa Tanner in the September 1991 issue of The
World & I. |
How are we to write the history of the art of the last ten years? Better yet, do we really need to? At the end of every decade there's a natural impulse to survey it. This one was no exception. Within the last eighteen months, there have been no less than three major eighties-in-review exhibitions in various parts of the country.
These exhibitions were revealing not for what they told us about developments in art in the preceding decade - which was very little - but more for what they said about the dubious necessity of mounting such exhibitions and the problems inherent in doing so. Chief among these is the fact that after five Whitney Biennial exhibitions, the ground to be covered in a decade survey is anything but unfamiliar-surely the primary reason to mount such exhibitions.
Assembling Exhibitions
More seriously, there is the troubling issue of perpetuating the status quo in such exhibitions. It is - or is supposed to be - the task of a curator to bring to the business of assembling exhibitions a disinterested viewpoint, one capable of making discriminating judgments about the quality of the work under review. In addition, such a viewpoint should provide us with an interpretation of the period that, while it may not willfully overturn established notions of what went on, at least makes some attempt to tell us something new about it. But the last thing any of the curators seemed to be after for these three exhibitions was divergent opinion. The point of the exercise these days is to reinforce, not deviate from, established critical orthodoxies and notions of
... (1929 of 10579 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|
