The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Is There Any Hope for Argentina?


Article # : 17528 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 7 / 1990  3,298 Words
Author : Lowell Gustafson
Lowell Gustafson teaches Latin American studies and international political economics at Villanova University.

       "Our hap [fortune] is loss, our hope but sad despair," Shakespeare wrote in King Lear. This has often seemed to be the Argentine national motto. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the wish to be as "rich as an Argentine" was common among Europeans, who saw the sons of the estancieros (owners of large farms) living well as they traveled throughout the continent.
       
        In 1912, a new electoral law was passed ensuring greater democratic participation by the emerging middle class, represented by the Union Civic Radical Party. But the military began a half century of domination of politics in 1930, and in 1946 the populist Gen. Juan Perón increased the pace of state intervention in the economy and encouraged the consumption of the nation's resource base. The trend toward democratic capitalism had been reversed.
       
        In 1955, Perón was forced into exile by coup. He had heavily taxed the agricultural sector, which preferred paying taxes to having land expropriated, and then used this money - and the foreign currency reserves built up in previous years - to pay for social programs. But the reserves ran out, the rural sector cut back on production, and Perón could no longer afford his programs. His former supporters, at that point, saw no advantage in opposing Perón's enemies in the military and the church.
       
        The anti-Perónists in the military, who had disliked Perón's power base in the unions, would not allow his party to field candidates in any elections after 1955. They did allow Radical Party presidents to be elected on two occasions but each time threw them out when they were about to legalize Perónist electoral participation. ... (2000 of 19580 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy