The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Democrats Gain in the States


Article # : 18298 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 10 / 1990  3,069 Words
Author : Michael Tanner
Michael Tanner is director of health and welfare studies with the Cato Institute and author of The End of Welfare: Fighting Poverty in a Civil Society.

       This election season, while the eyes of most political pundits and observers are fastened firmly on congressional campaigns, perhaps an even more important battle is taking place at the state level. Thirty-two states will elect governors this year and 47 states will select state legislators. Except for gubernatorial contests in a few large mediagenic states, these campaigns often lack the glamour and attention of races for the Congress. Yet, the outcome of these often-unheralded races could have a profound effect on the future of American politics.
       
        One of the enduring legacies of the Reagan administration has been the “new federalism” and a renewed emphasis on the role of state governments. For nearly half a century prior to President Reagan, the once-sovereign states frequently seemed to represent little more than the administrative agencies of a centralized government. In the 1970s, there were even proposals to abolish the states and replace them with more “rational” federal administrative zones. Under such circumstances it was natural for the media, the national party structures, and political interest groups to largely ignore state politics and concentrate on Congress and the presidency – “where the action was.”
       
        Much has changed in recent years, however. Reagan made it his No. 1 priority to reduce the size and power of the federal government. As a result, states are less dependent today on federal programs and revenues than they were 10 years ago. Even more importantly, they are less subservient to federal bureaucracies. Power is returning to state governments.
       
        At the same time, Congress has become increasingly important. ... (1999 of 18754 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy