The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

Too Little Savings?: The Cure May Be Worse Than the Disease


Article # : 18330 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 10 / 1990  6,186 Words
Author : Dan Mitchell and Andrew F. Quinlan
Dan Mitchell is currently John M. Olin senior fellow in political economy at the Heritage Foundation, a Washington- based nonprofit public policy organization. Prior to working with Heritage, he worked as an economist for Sen. Robert Packwood (R-Oregon), the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee Andrew F. Quinlan is a free-lance writer based in Washington, D.C., who specializes in economic issues.

       Economic policymakers and political commentators are almost unanimous in proclaiming a savings crisis in America. According to conventional wisdom, America's savings rate is at a record low level, depriving our economy of the funds needed to generate future economic growth. These “experts” maintain that the trade deficit, high interest rates, and a sluggish economy are just a few of the consequences of our consumption-oriented society.
       
        Numerous policy proposals have been advanced to address the supposed savings crisis. Some politicians believe that raising people's taxes will encourage them to save more. Others, including President Bush, think the answer is to reduce the current tax system’s bias against saving. Many economists feel that other factors unrelated to the tax code depress savings and have suggested policy changes to address those areas.
       
        The savings controversy is often needlessly confused because of a failure to understand that there are two separate concepts of savings. The savings rate is what economists call a flow, representing the portion of income that is not consumed in a specific period of time. Savings, on the other hand, is properly measured as a stock, the total level of savings that exists at any given time.
       
        Politicians often fail to grasp the difference between the savings rate and total savings. For instance, reducing the federal budget deficit will not - as politicians constantly maintain - increase our savings rate. Indeed, it will not even increase total savings. Instead, if done properly, a lower budget deficit will increase the amount of savings that will be available for private sector ... (1990 of 37273 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy