The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

'Privacy' vs. The Public's 'Right to Know'


Article # : 18455 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 9 / 1990  5,008 Words
Author : Sanford Levinson
Sanford Levinson is a professor of Law and Government at the University of Texas, Austin. He is the author of Constitutional Faith, Princeton University Press (1988).

       One of the things that should certainly be clear from earlier articles in this symposium is the protean quality of the notion of “privacy,” especially when applied to such practices as contraception and abortion. Almost all analysts have agreed through that one core aspect of privacy is the ability to control the release of important information about oneself. Sometimes this will mean that persons will be able to keep their thoughts or knowledge of past conduct entirely to themselves. Other times persons will be glad to share thoughts or memories, but only with a restricted circle of others whom they select. To be deprived of such freedom - to be, as the French social analyst Michel Foucault might have put it, with “the gaze” of unselected others - is, at the extreme, to feel violated and subject to the penetration of strangers. (The sexual imagery is deliberate.) Still, a moment's thought will remind us that we are, as a society, scarcely willing to give to individuals absolute control over the distribution of information about themselves. All of us depend in vital ways on the ability to find out information about others. Almost every assertion of a privacy right to limit access to information can be met with a plausible “right to know” claim based on the public benefits attached to wide access to the information in question.
       
        Consider, then, the following examples where the public's alleged right to know might come into conflict with a claim to privacy protected against involuntary disclosure:
       
        · A criminal defendant, citing the Fifth Amendment's guarantee against compelled self -incrimination, refuses to testify even though all evidence points to his culpability and he could provide important details about the criminal ... (1989 of 31143 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy