|

|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
Hollywood Takes On the President
| Article
# : |
15849 |
|
|
Section : |
SPECIAL SECTION
|
| Issue
Date : |
1 / 1997 |
3,402 Words |
| Author
: |
Peter C. Rollins Peter C. Rollins is Regents Professor of English and
American/Film Studies at Oklahoma State University. A Vietnam
veteran, he has served as state commander of the Military
Order of the World Wars--Eastern Oklahoma Chapter and as
president, Cimarron Chapter of Retired Officers of America. He
edits the scholarly journal Film & History (http://h-
net2.msu.edu/-filmhis/). His recent books include Hollywood's
World War I (Popular Press) and Hollywood's Indian (University
Press of Kentucky). |
Character is something very hard to define, but everybody knows what we mean when we use the word. Character might be described as the sum total of a person's inherited characteristics, plus what he does with them. We begin with thoughts, thoughts translate themselves into acts, and acts repeated evolve into habits. Habits form character, character determines destiny, and destiny is tied up irrevocably with destination. ----John S. Higgins Lay Readers Sermons Is presidential character a proper topic for discussion and debate? During the U.S. presidential campaign of 1992, the question of character was pushed off the national agenda in favor of the issue of economics. In 1996, Robert Dole raised the subject of character more forcefully. Yet Clinton spin doctors dismissed the Dole arguments about character as diversions from legitimate issues of a presidential campaign--issues such as Medicare, gun control, and the national debt. Motion pictures about American presidents made since 1945 provide fascinating commentary on the issue. Films about America's presidents do not merely touch on the topic of character--they are obsessed with it. Indeed, from Darryl Zanuck's Wilson of 1944 to the apocalyptic Independence Day of 1996, Hollywood's films about the presidency devote considerable attention to the nature of presidential character. Why? Because Americans do not merely change administrations every four years (or have the opportunity to do so); they have the option to change sovereigns with every presidential election. Unlike the British, Americans do not have a monarchy to lend symbolic continuity to the national identity. The transitions, as a result, impose more of a burden
... (2000 of 21495 Characters)
Read Full Article
|
|