The World & I Online Magazine, ONline Archive and Educational Resource  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
Username:   Password:      Subscribe Now   Register   About Us | Contact Us | FAQs      
The World & I Archive Peoples of the World Book Reviews Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

The World & I Magazine
 
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
American Waves
Book Reviews
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Traveling the Globe
Writers and Writing

The "Three Strikes" Law


Article # : 23037 

Section : EDITORIAL
Issue Date : 5 / 2003  299 Words
Author :
Masha Nordbye is a writer and TV documentary producer who has traveled through more than one hundred countries. Her latest book is Moscow, St. Petersburg and the Golden Ring (Odyssey).

       David Slade's article, "Three Strikes and You're Out!" [January 2003, p. 54], caught our attention. The article tells of Leandro Andrade, a man thrice convicted of shoplifting videotapes, who was sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 50 years--the same sentence for first-degree murder--because of the "three strikes" law in the state of California.
       
       We believe that with a law so broad, there is sure to be controversy. So many crimes are committed, each of different severity. Lumping them together under one sentence is not the answer. In our opinion, the three strikes law is too general to be fair in the modern judicial system. We think that repeat offenders should be dealt with on a case-by-case basis, rather than having a criminal who has committed nonviolent crimes be given an overzealous punishment.
       
       The very nature of justice is fairness. Shouldn't the punishment fit the crime? Shouldn't there be more of a correlation between the crime and punishment, rather than a quick-fix, "lock-em-up-and-throw-away-the-key" answer to every crime, no matter how small (as long as there's three of them). Is a murderer the same as a thief? Is a rapist the same as a tax cheat? Is a child molester the same as a drug dealer?
       
       Regardless of the answer, they are being punished as if they were the same. We understand that the three strikes law is an attempt to crack down on repeat offenders, and the notion is a noble one, but the nigh infinitely broad spectrum of crime isn't something that can be treated with a standard singular punishment. We in no way mean this as sympathy for criminals, but it needs to be said that first-degree murder and ... (1991 of 1807 Characters)
Read Full Article

Copyright © 2004 The World & I Online. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy