|
Nothing he could have done would have prevented his
fate. It was time for a new order, and that new order, in the form of
Spanish rule, could not be hindered.
Likewise, when it is time for the present order to
end, it will end, and there is nothing anyone can do to
stop it.
This
myth reveals a vision of time, and of the historical events
flowing through it, that differs radically from that espoused
in modern Western civilization.
The modern vision of history is one of continual
progress, not the fatalism of recurring cycles depicted
in the narrative of Incariy.
There are, however, two variations on the modern theme,
one evolutionary and the other revolutionary. In the first case, human history is imagined as gradually but steadily
spiraling upward in a constant improvement of the human
condition. In the revolutionary version, improvements
are brought about by abrupt, cataclysmic changes when the
old order is destroyed or violently and radically altered,
and when a new order, better both morally and materially
than the old, will arise from the ruins of what had gone
before.
 |
|
In
the myth of Incariy, King Inca met the fate he and
all Incas were destined for by being killed by Spaniards.
It is believed that the present order will end when
his head and body,buried in separate places, grow
back together. Then the Incas will return to power,
while the world will turn upside down.
|
This variation is seen not only in the Marxian utopias
of secular ideology but also in the apocalyptic nature of
Western religion. The
religious vision of the Great Revolution is clearly stated
in the Book of Revelation, where the prophet, looking into
the future, saw “a new heaven and a new earth, for the first
heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was
no more sea.” In
that future period, said the prophet, a city four square,
the New Jerusalem, will descend from God out of Heaven;
a city in which people will live under radically different
conditions. For
“God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there
shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither
shall there be any more pain: for the former things are
passed away.”
In contrast to this notion of radical, qualitative
revolution, the Andean folk idea of change adheres to the
original meaning of the word revolution; that is,
a rotation from one state to another, then back again.
|